Deflation is looming as the greatest threat to Western economies, especially for heavily indebted nations, like the U.S. and Britain.

Many people are belatedly waking up to the gravity of the situation. In Britain, former Chancellor of the Exchequer, Ken Clarke, has dismissed comparisons with the 1970s, ’80s and ’90s, likening current conditions explicitly with 1929/30.

Normally cautious Bank of England Governor, Mervyn King, forecasts a 2 percent contraction in the British economy next year, with interest rates falling rapidly to nought percent for the first time in history.

Deflation is now the enemy we must all factor in to our expectations in the near-to-medium terms, even in the dependably buoyant American economy. The Japanese “lost decade” of the 1990s may be set to play out across the world.

Why then is deflation necessarily worse than inflation?

In an era of massive indebtedness, both private and public, deflation increases the burden. As incomes decline, debts remain the same — at levels signed for in better times. It’s the exact opposite of the apparent wealth created during periods of rapidly rising house prices.

Professor Peter Spencer of York University says, “It is going to be absolute murder in Britain if inflation turns negative. The big difference with past episodes is that we are now much more heavily indebted. Few people owned their own houses in 1930s. Debts were miniscule.”

Another symptom of deflation is that consumers wait for lower prices before shopping, causing job-losses in Main Street and yet more bad economic news.

So what can be done either to pre-empt or cure the curse of falling prices across the board?

Curiously, Keynesianism which, in its misunderstood version is disastrous in normal times, does hold out some hope in depressive conditions. Expect central banks to start printing money soon and dropping it from helicopters, if they haven’t started already. Want to buy some rising stock? Buy helicopter shares. [This is not financial advice.]

If you’re one of those noble souls who saved assiduously during the asset bubbles, you will just have to stand by and watch the profligate oafs who caused the problem clean up, while your own responsible hoard of value drains away.

It’s just not fair, but it will probably have to happen “for the greater good”.

Related Stories
Sorry folks there’s a depression in the sea air
The world needs Up-To-A-Pointism
The Kraken Wakes
Depression looms like a yawning abyss

It may sound strange but Harvard University bears a heavy responsibility for the credit crunch.

Last week a “flight to safety” of investors in America’s $3.5 trillion Treasury money market was only halted by Secretary Henry Paulson’s swift action in nationalising the banking sector’s bad debts.

Read The Great Harvard Sausage Scandal 2008 over at Syntagma.

Who, then, are the people that created this vastly complex set of financial instruments based on the always-temporary phenomenon of rapidly-rising asset prices? And who were their managers who let them do it?

It appears that a large number of them are alumni of the Harvard Business School, even those working in Britain and Europe. President Bush is one of them. British PM Gordon Brown has surrounded himself with such types for more than a decade.

Read the rest of the article.

A version of this article appeared in Syntagma recently.

As we predicted here, this credit crunch cum downturn cum recession cum slump cum … was always going to happen in slow motion. That’s because of the normal lags involved in the transfer of economic conditions between countries and continents. Britian is said to be around nine months to a year behind America.

While the U.S. downturn started at the back end of last summer, it’s only now starting to decimate the British economy and parts of the eurozone. If we want to know how bad it’s going to get, we only need to peer across the Pond.

Gold rushes come and go in the world’s innovation capital, California. But when they go … they really go.

The City of Vallejo in California has filed for Chapter 9 bankruptcy, making history it seems. Half Moon Bay, home to some internet digerati, may well be next. According to John Moorlach, Orange County board chief, “This is the tip of the iceberg: everybody is going to line up for Chapter 9 in California.”

What can it mean to people on the ground when their city goes belly up? What of their assets, houses etcetera? It will be interesting to watch this pan out.

According to Goldman Sachs and Lehman Brothers American house prices are likely to fall 25pc from peak to trough. With between 10m and 12m households in negative equity already, there’s still a way to go.

Shares across the developed world are set for big falls too. Albert Edward Société Générale’s global strategist says, “Nowhere and nothing will be immune. We are on the cusp of an equity meltdown that will slash and shred portfolios. We see a global recession unfolding. Liquidity will drain away and crush the twin emerging market and commodity bubbles. The recent hope that ‘the worst might be over’ is truly staggering. Profits are disintegrating.”

Ambrose Evans Pritchard of the Telegraph (UK) — ever the Cassandra (rightly so, in my view) — says pointedly, “Britain, Europe, Japan, and China will go down before America comes back up. This is turning into a synchronised bust, after all. The Global Slump of 2008-09 is under way.”

The Bank of England and the European Central Bank are still stubbornly refusing to cut rates because of inflation fears, which will be the least of our miseries in the next two years and should abate soon as global demand falls off the much-imagined cliff.

It’s probably true that Ben Bernanke’s Federal Reserve has saved the U.S. and other countries from another Great Depression. But nothing can stop a slump now because it’s already happening.

Here we go again. Yesterday’s news of trouble at JP Morgan, America’s second biggest bank, is today matched by Royal Bank of Scotland, the UK’s second largest. RBS is another huge loser in the American subprime mortage market and is set to announce big writedowns next week.

RBS is understood to be seeking to raise capital from its shareholders in a rights issue thought to amount to £10 billion ($20bn), which is probably the biggest rights issue ever demanded in the UK.

The bank, which bought troubled NatWest and ABM Amro, has been running on low capital ratios for quite a while. It also has major exposure to subprime debt instruments. It has been linked with Spain’s Banco Santander for many years.

When such a major player is caught short like this, it brings home the extent and depth of the crisis in transatlantic financial markets, with all the knockon effects to the rest of the world.

Vince Cable, a spokesmen on Treasury matters who carries more weight than the Treasury these days, believes all the banks should follow the example of RBS, since they will need a great deal of liquidity from the Bank of England and that should be underwritten by shareholders, not taxpayers.

Next week’s announcement will be awaited with some trepidation.