If you live in Britain, the part-nationalisation of the banking sector will cost you at least £8,000 ($12,000) in taxes.

£500 billion ($750bn) is a conservative estimate of what taxpayers are paying for Gordon Brown’s plan to bail out the UK banking system. The three-part package includes committing up to £50 billion of taxpayer funds for a part-nationalization of Lloyds TSB, HBOS and Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), which is now 57 per cent owned by the government.

Furthermore, the Bank of England will pump at least £200 billion into the money markets to encourage banks to lend to each other again – which should help lower the costs of new mortgages.

The Government is also making a further £250 billion available for banks over the next three years to guarantee medium-term debt which is of dubious quality. This is intended to help restore confidence and get banks lending to each other again.

£500 billion is equivalent to 4,000 new hospitals, or 16 new high speed rail links between London, the north of England and Scotland.

This is the price we are paying for poor regulation of the banks by the governmment in the first place.

The British housing market could take 20 years to recover says one of the City of London’s leading investment banks.

In a note to clients, Mark Hake, an analyst at Merrill Lynch said ” … it looks significantly worse [than the 1990 downturn], with house prices falling faster and further and very little recovery in real terms expected over 20 years. … House prices are expected to be below their August 2007 peak in a further 10 years’ time.”

The investment bank forecasts house prices to fall 17 per cent this year, while inflation is set to continue its upward march in coming months as the economy absorbs the effects of higher oil and food prices.

If that were not bad enough, David Kern, economic advisor to the British Chambers of Commerce, thinks unemployment will rise to nearly two million by the end of 2009. He commented, “The results of this survey signal a menacing deterioration in UK prospects We are now facing serious risks of recession. London appears pretty weak and it’s across the board. Businesses are in a lose-lose situation. Falling demand and the squeeze on consumer disposable incomes will limit how far prices can be increased.”

With Nicola Horlick warning us off shares for three years, there aren’t many places left to put our funds.

As RBS’s credit analyst said last week, cash is the only safe haven now.

Here we go again. Yesterday’s news of trouble at JP Morgan, America’s second biggest bank, is today matched by Royal Bank of Scotland, the UK’s second largest. RBS is another huge loser in the American subprime mortage market and is set to announce big writedowns next week.

RBS is understood to be seeking to raise capital from its shareholders in a rights issue thought to amount to £10 billion ($20bn), which is probably the biggest rights issue ever demanded in the UK.

The bank, which bought troubled NatWest and ABM Amro, has been running on low capital ratios for quite a while. It also has major exposure to subprime debt instruments. It has been linked with Spain’s Banco Santander for many years.

When such a major player is caught short like this, it brings home the extent and depth of the crisis in transatlantic financial markets, with all the knockon effects to the rest of the world.

Vince Cable, a spokesmen on Treasury matters who carries more weight than the Treasury these days, believes all the banks should follow the example of RBS, since they will need a great deal of liquidity from the Bank of England and that should be underwritten by shareholders, not taxpayers.

Next week’s announcement will be awaited with some trepidation.

With the U.S. now firmly in recession, Syntagma looks at the causes of this spectacular downturn and speculates that the Iraq war may have a lot to do with it.

“The American economy is now in recession. A slew of new data clearly reveals both a marked downturn in activity, combined with a rise in inflation — something not seen since the stubborn “stagflation” period of the 1970s. Some economists expect a robust return to growth later in the year off the backs of aggressive rate cuts by the Fed…”

Read the article here.

In another piece today, our sister site examines banks’ attitude to risk and how securitization let the side down, handing huge advantages to authoritarian Asian regimes.

“In the old days, banks took the risk of lending money on themselves and ensured that borrowers would be able to pay it back over time. Securitization means that they can lend to any Tom, Dick or Harriet, package up the debts into large parcels of small slices from many borrowers, and sell them onto other banks and finance houses.”

Read the article here.